Discussion » Nonsense » At least 600,000 civilians killed in Iraq, study f

  • 王经纬
    王经纬 wrote:
    <p><span style="font-size: x-large;">At least <span style="color: #ff0000;">600,000 civilians</span> killed in Iraq, study finds</span></p> <p><span><span>Sabrina Tavernise in Baghdad</span><br /><span style="font-size: x-large; color: #ff0000;">October 12, 2006</span><br /></span></p> <p>MORE than 600,000 civilians have died in violence across Iraq since the 2003 US invasion, a study by American and Iraqi public health researchers has estimated.</p> <p>The figure - the highest estimate for the civilian death toll in the war - breaks down to about 15,000 violent deaths a month, quadruple the number of deaths for July given by Iraqi government hospitals and the morgue in Baghdad and published last month in a United Nations report on Iraq.</p> <p>The number of civilian deaths that month was the highest since the war began.</p> <p>The study, which was released on Tuesday, is the second by researchers from the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. The figure of 600,000 is an estimate, not a precise count, and the researchers acknowledged a margin of error that meant the toll could range from 426,369 to 793,663 deaths.</p> <p>The study uses samples of casualties from Iraqi households to extrapolate an overall figure of 601,027 Iraqis dead from violence between March 2003 and July 2006.</p> <p>The findings of the previous study, published in 2004, had been criticised as high, in part because of its relatively narrow sampling of about 1000 families, and because it carried a large margin of error.</p> <p>The new study is more representative and the sampling is broader, the researchers said. They surveyed 1849 Iraqi families in 47 different neighbourhoods across Iraq, based on population size, not on the level of violence, they said.</p> <p>In late September, the Iraqi Government barred the Baghdad central morgue and the Health Ministry from releasing figures to the media. Now, only the Government is allowed to release figures.</p> <p>The US military has disputed Iraqi figures, saying they are far higher than the true number of deaths from the insurgency and sectarian violence, in part because they include natural deaths and deaths from ordinary crime. However, the military has not released its own figures for the death toll.</p> <p>Iraq's mortality rate before the war was about 5.5 people per 1000 per year, the study found. The rate rose to 19.8 deaths per 1000 people in the year ending in June.</p> <p>Gunshot wounds were the most common cause of death, at 56 per cent of all violent deaths, while car bombs accounted for about 13 per cent. The proportion of deaths caused by the US military declined from March 2003 to June 2006.</p> <p>The vast majority of deaths documented were substantiated by death certificates. The researchers asked for certificates 87 per cent of the time; when they did, more than 90 per cent of households produced them.</p> <p>Ronald Waldman, an epidemiologist at New York's Columbia University who worked for the US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention for many years, called the survey method "tried and true". "This is the best estimate of mortality we have," Professor Waldman said.</p> <p>His view was echoed by Sarah Leah Whitson, an official of Human Rights Watch in New York. "We have no reason to question the findings or the accuracy
  • 王经纬
    王经纬 wrote:

    Who killed those people???

    Bad Iraqi??? A local ganster??? Lol how powerful they are???

    Lots of people from the country that is currently invading other nations are still shamelessly denying the slaughter they did just like they did in Vietnam.

  • 随便叫兽
    随便叫兽 wrote:

    in b4 Captain America shows up with his justified casualty rainbow unicorn fairy magic abacus to calculate the number of lives "saved" by Americans killing the bad guys.

  • 王经纬
    王经纬 wrote:

    600,000 civilians killed, by the time October 12, 2006!

    How many civilians were slaughtered there by now???????No one is able to count!

  • Fahad Hashmi
    Fahad Hashmi wrote:

    But still 'WE' are the bad guys .

    You know ,114 drone strikes in Pakistan between 2004  to 2010 approximately 1216 people had been killed,out those only 3% were "considered" Militans and 1/3rd of them were 'Children'.

    Yeah but still we are the bad guys.

    in Palestine 4,226 were killed including 1452 were children in 2006 only .

    But  yeah WE still are the bad guys.

     From October 7, 2001 and June 3, 2003, at least 3,100 to 3,600 civilians were directly killed by U.S army in Afghanistan. 

    So guess who are the bad guys,or should i say terrorist.

Please login to post a reply to this thread.


WeLiveInBeijing.com is a social community for people living in or traveling to Beijing.

Powered by: Bloc